Thermal
history interpretation
of AFTA data
AFTA is based on the progressive reduction in track
length as a function of temperature and time ("fission track annealing").
This reduction in track length is also manifested as a reduction in
fission track age. New tracks are produced throughout geological time,
as a result of spontaneous fission of uranium impurity atoms within
the apatite crystal lattice. In a sample which is heated and then cooled,
tracks produced up to the time at which cooling begins will be shortened
to a length determined by the maximum paleotemperature, while tracks
produced after the onset of cooling will be longer. The proportion of
shorter to longer tracks is determined by the time at which cooling
began, in relation to the overall duration of the history.
The basic process of extracting thermal history solutions
from AFTA data involves modelling AFTA parameters through various thermal
history solutions, so as to define the range of maximum paleotemperatures
and timing of cooling for which predictions are consistent with the
measured data.
This process requires a detailed knowledge of the kinetics
of the annealing process, and the way this depends on apatite composition.
The following example, based on a simple mono-compositional
example, illustrates the basic principles involved.
Triassic
sandstone:
Depositional age = 240 Ma
Fission track age = 183 ± 12 Ma
Mean track length = 11.7 ± 0.2 Ma

|

|

|

|
Step
1: Vary maximum paleo-temperature while
holding the timing of cooling fixed. at 120 Ma (the mid-point
of the history). Compare predictions with measured parameters. |
Main
mode in the length distribution is not short enough.
Insufficient age reduction. |
Too
many short tracks.
Too much age reduction. |
Shorter
mode in the predicted length distribution matches the measured
lengths, but too many short tracks.
Predicted f.t. age is close to measured value. |
A maximum paleotemperature around 90°C is appropriate for this sample,
but the timing is still uncertain.

|

|

|

|
|
Step 2: Fix
maximum paleotemperature and vary the timing of cooling. Compare
predictions with measured parameters. |
Too
many long tracks.
Insuffucient age reduction. |
Too
many short tracks.
Predicted f.t. age is within error of measured value. |
Predicted
length distribution shows a good match to the measured track lengths.
Predicted age is close to the measured value. |
Of the options illustrated, cooling from a maximum paleotemperature
of 90°C beginning at 50 Ma gives the best match between measured and
predicted data. Further optimisation would allow formal definition of
best fit values.
In practice, annealing kinetics depend
on Cl content.

|

|
|
Fission track age against Cl content for individual
apatite grains from a single sample of volcanogenic sandstone
from a present-day temperature of ~95°C in the Flaxmans-1 well,
Otway Basin. Fission tracks in fluorine-rich (Cl poor) grains
are more easily annealed than grains with higher Cl contents.
As a result, zero fission track ages (totally reset) are measured
in Cl-poor grains while Cl-rich grains in the same sample have
undergone little or no age reduction. |
Laboratory annealing studies also reveal the
systematic influence of chlorine content on annealing kinetics.
In this plot, measured mean lengths are plotted against a function
of annealing temperature and time, designed to bring all data
onto a common scale. At any given temperature-time combination,
low Cl apatites show a greater degree of annealing than Cl-rich
apatites. |
Thermal history solutions are extracted
from data broken down into discrete compositional groups, using separate
kinetics for each group. The final thermal history solution should not
only match the pooled data but the variation of fission track age and
length with wt% Cl.

|

|
| This
plot shows real data from a Triassic sandstone, with predicted
patterns of f.t. age vs wt% Cl for three different thermal histories:
1: 80°C at 100 Ma 2:
100°C at 60 Ma 3:
120°C at 40 Ma
A maximum paleotemperature of 100°C at 60 Ma gives the best fit. |
Track length data, pooled into compositional
groups, are also used in defining the preferred values of maximum
paleotemperature and time at which cooling began. |
 |
 |
|
The match between predicted and measured track
length data is easier to display visually in terms of track length
distributions for each wt% Cl group. In the above example, data
from eight discrete compositional groups within the same sample
are used to define the final thermal history solution. |
Rigorous statistical
procedures allow definition of best-fit values of maximum paleotemperature
and the timing of cooling, with associated ±95% confidence limits.
A later event can often be similarly constrained, as illustrated
above. |